Racine Connected Dots

Property disposition relationship & evidence explorer

Connected Dots

Select a node to reveal its documented neighborhood.

Solid = documented/high confidenceDashed = verify/research leadClick any dot or line for evidence.

Case Studies & Story Views

Curated evidence narratives that remain linked to the live graph and timeline.

Choose a story.

Property Comparator

Put two parcels side-by-side across foreclosure, owner treatment, lane, consideration, recipient, and outcome.

↔

Property Map

See the geographic pattern, filter the control group, and jump directly from a parcel to its evidence network.

Map tiles © OpenStreetMap contributors. Automatically resolved coordinates are research aids until manually verified against an authoritative parcel/GIS source.

Geographic Connections

Nearby properties and shared evidence relationships for the selected parcel.

Select a property to analyze nearby dots.

Property Control Group

Compare disposition lanes, foreclosure cohorts, former-owner treatment, and downstream outcomes.

PropertyFormer ownerCaseLaneCounty recipientCurrent / recorded ownerThe Ten

Disposition Timeline

Chronological decisions, transfers, sales, and institutional actions.

Research Targets

Open records pulls, verification items, unresolved identities, and evidence gaps.

Saved Investigation Views

Bookmarks and investigator notes are stored only in this browser.

Bookmarked dots

Investigator notes

Why This Site Was Created

A citizen accountability project of H.O.T. Government — Honest, Open, Transparent.

When a county takes a home or a lot for unpaid taxes, that property belongs, for a moment, to the public. What happens next is supposed to be open: Wisconsin law generally requires tax-foreclosed property to be sold through an advertised, appraised, competitive process that any resident can take part in. But the law also lets a county hand property to a city, a community development authority, or a nonprofit outside that public process — and once it does, there has been little to guarantee where the property, or its value, finally lands. When it lands with a favored recipient for little or nothing, the difference between that price and the property's real value is a cost the public never voted for and rarely sees.

This site exists to make that journey visible.

It began with a simple question: when public property in Racine changed hands, did every resident get the same chance at it — or did some recipients get an inside track that ordinary taxpayers never had? Answering that meant assembling the public record parcel by parcel — foreclosure judgments, county and city resolutions, meeting minutes, recorded deeds, and transfer returns — and laying the connections out where anyone can follow them.

The goal is not to accuse. It is to document, and to let the documentation speak. Every relationship shown here is tied to a source, and every item still unverified is labeled as a lead rather than a fact. Where the record raises a fair question, the question is put plainly and the official involved is invited to answer it. Where the record shows something was done properly, that belongs in the picture too.

The larger purpose is reform, not grievance. The patterns collected here point to a gap in how public property is disposed of statewide — a gap that lets the benefit of a public asset flow to the well-connected while the process stays out of public view. And the loss is real and measurable: when a property is transferred for little or no money, the taxpayer loses the value that a fair, open sale would have returned. That property was a public asset. Its full value — the back taxes it could have recovered, the sale price it could have brought, the tax roll it could have rejoined — belongs to the community, not to whoever is positioned to receive it for a fraction of its worth. Too often the former owner is left with nothing, and the taxpayer absorbs a loss that never appears on any ledger. Naming that gap clearly is the first step to closing it.

This is a citizen accountability project of H.O.T. Government — Honest, Open, Transparent. The premise is that public business should be exactly those three things, and that a resident with public records and patience can help make it so.

How to Use This Site

This site is an interactive evidence explorer, not an article.

This site is an interactive evidence explorer, not an article. It lets you follow the documented relationships among people, properties, and public bodies in Racine's tax-foreclosed-property record, and check the source behind each one for yourself. Here's how to move through it.

Start with the one idea that makes everything else make sense. Every connection on this site is marked for confidence. A solid line means a documented, high-confidence relationship the underlying records support. A dashed line means a research lead still being verified. A connection shows that a relationship exists in the record — it does not, by itself, claim wrongdoing, illegality, or intent. Keep that distinction in mind and the rest of the site reads clearly.

If you want the story, start with Case Stories. These are curated narratives that walk you through what the records show, in plain order, while staying linked to the live evidence. It's the best entry point if you're new.

If you want to explore on your own, use the Network graph. Pick any dot — a person, a property, a body — or search for one, and the graph reveals its documented neighborhood. Click any dot or any line between dots and the Evidence panel shows you why it's connected: the confidence level, the source reference, the date, and the underlying text. “Connect Two Dots” will trace the shortest documented path between any two things in the record.

If you want to see the pattern, use the Property Map and the Comparator. The map shows the geographic footprint and lets you filter the ten properties at the center of the investigation against the larger control group. The Comparator puts any two parcels side by side across foreclosure, owner treatment, disposition lane, consideration paid, recipient, and outcome — so you can judge for yourself whether like cases were treated alike. This is where the taxpayer's stake becomes concrete: when a parcel changes hands for little or nothing, the gap between that price and its real value is the loss the public absorbs, and the Comparator lets you see it parcel by parcel.

If you want the raw material, use Properties, Timeline, and Research. The Properties table is the full control group; the Timeline lays out the decisions and transfers in chronological order; and Research Targets is the open list of records still being pulled and questions still being verified — including what remains unproven.

A note on what this site is. It is built to let you check the evidence, not to take anyone's word for it — including ours. Where something is verified, the source is one click away. Where something isn't yet, it's labeled as a lead, not a finding. Anything you bookmark or annotate stays in your own browser only.

About the Data

Dataset scope, evidence rules, and source workbooks behind the Connected Dots system.

How to read this system

This application separates documented connections from items still requiring verification. A connection means the underlying workbook records a relationship; it does not, by itself, establish wrongdoing, illegality, or intent.

The graph is designed around evidence provenance. Select any relationship to see its confidence, source reference, date, event, and evidence text.

Current data build

This version incorporates OTC Control Group Exhibit v38, the latest uploaded CDA Disposition Table, and the corrected 1212 Highland Ave listing price of $229,000.

Static deployment

No Node.js, React, database, API, build step, or server-side code is required. All application code and data live in this folder.

Dataset

Source workbooks

How to Use This Site

This site is an interactive evidence explorer, not an article. It lets you follow the documented relationships among people, properties, and public bodies in Racine's tax-foreclosed-property record, and check the source behind each one for yourself. Here's how to move through it.

Start with the one idea that makes everything else make sense. Every connection on this site is marked for confidence. A solid line means a documented, high-confidence relationship the underlying records support. A dashed line means a research lead still being verified. A connection shows that a relationship exists in the record — it does not, by itself, claim wrongdoing, illegality, or intent. Keep that distinction in mind and the rest of the site reads clearly.

If you want the story, start with Case Stories. These are curated narratives that walk you through what the records show, in plain order, while staying linked to the live evidence. It's the best entry point if you're new.

If you want to explore on your own, use the Network graph. Pick any dot — a person, a property, a body — or search for one, and the graph reveals its documented neighborhood. Click any dot or any line between dots and the Evidence panel shows you why it's connected: the confidence level, the source reference, the date, and the underlying text. “Connect Two Dots” will trace the shortest documented path between any two things in the record.

If you want to see the pattern, use the Property Map and the Comparator. The map shows the geographic footprint and lets you filter the ten properties at the center of the investigation against the larger control group. The Comparator puts any two parcels side by side across foreclosure, owner treatment, disposition lane, consideration paid, recipient, and outcome — so you can judge for yourself whether like cases were treated alike. This is where the taxpayer's stake becomes concrete: when a parcel changes hands for little or nothing, the gap between that price and its real value is the loss the public absorbs, and the Comparator lets you see it parcel by parcel.

If you want the raw material, use Properties, Timeline, and Research. The Properties table is the full control group; the Timeline lays out the decisions and transfers in chronological order; and Research Targets is the open list of records still being pulled and questions still being verified — including what remains unproven.

A note on what this site is. It is built to let you check the evidence, not to take anyone's word for it — including ours. Where something is verified, the source is one click away. Where something isn't yet, it's labeled as a lead, not a finding. Anything you bookmark or annotate stays in your own browser only.

Closing this guide hides it on future visits in this browser. Reopen it anytime under About → How To Use.